|
Du bist hier: Referate Datenbank | Englisch
| Lear, King: What's happening
Lear, King: What's happening
Interpretation
The history of King Lear and his three daughters is an old British legend.
In his interpretation Shakespeare takes different sources; the main
character is supposed to be taken from “The True Chronicle History of King
Leir”. It is very odd for Shakespeare’s way of writing that the plot
changes so abrupt and all of a sudden. He abridges and concentrates the main
plot and develops the material of a relatively irrelevant play into a tragedy,
that is in order to convey a message about the last things of the human
existence and his dangerous situation.
This aspect could be shown in the end of his tragedy: The source material
tells about the return of Leir to his throne in order to reign over England
whereas Shakespeare makes the event more aggressive, especially by describing
the death of our protagonist Lear and his beloved daughter Cordelia.
In the structure of the appearance of the different characters and their
dialogues, Shakespeare does not only try to deal with subjects or topics that
are bound up to the act, like the problem of getting old, the relation father -
children, the position of the king towards his nation and so on, he is including
larger complexes of problems.
These are among other things: Human self- knowledge and self- deception,
cognition and madness, true and wrong values, the relation of individual and
society, love and hate (of course), idealism, egoism and materialism, wealth and
poverty, justice and arbitrariness.
Beside this, the hero of this tragedy “King Lear” takes a very
important part in Shakespeare’s works. If we read Hamlet or Macbeth, we
won’t forget by reaching the disastrous ending that the hero is jointly
responsible of all.
The fatal weakness in Hamlet, the error in Othello and the injustice in
Macbeth are in the end obvious.
But that doesn’t fit to “Lear”. By reaching the end, the
old king was a long time passive. Shakespeare shows a suffering and hardly an
acting human being. His suffering was moreover that cruelty, and our indignation
towards those persons who had caused this, was that deep, that one is forgetting
about the injustice Lear performed to Cordelia, Kent and his Royal Kingdom.
That’s why it remains unremarked that it was Lear, who produced the
“storm”, through his own way of acting.
King Lear
Jester
Kent
Goneril Cordelia Regan
Duke of Albany King of France Duke of
Cornwall
Earl of Gloucester
Edmund Edgar (“Poor
Toms”)
|